Another Nevada Hot Spot?
Page added: June 8, 2005
The
following Pictures are courtesy of "Drew" from Gardnerville, Nevada.
|
May
27, 2005
This evening I took these two
pictures (A, and B Below) in sequence at around 7:30pm....(May 26, 2005)
I didn't hear anything....nor did
I notice anything when I snapped the picture....I took around 200
pictures tonight on a walk with my digital camera....kinda
blurry...not my best - that's why I take so many - once in a while I
get lucky....
Drew A.
Gardnerville, NV
May 28, 2005
You have my permission to post
them on your website....that would be fun. I'll tell all my friends
to check them out.
The digital camera is a Kodak
EasyShare CX7525 - 5.0 Mega Pixels.
I don't search the skies for
UFOs....I just have been taking a ton of pictures with the digital
camera since we moved to the Carson Valley from Northern California.
I have no insights re
this....it was odd that I didn't see anything, nor did I hear
anything. The pictures were taken seconds apart....so it wasn't a
shape in the clouds. Maybe it's a bug? Thanks,
Drew A.
Gardnerville Nevada
|
|
![]() |
A. Left,
Drew sent us two pictures, presumably together in sequence, to show that the object shown in the second one wasn't there only a few seconds earlier in this first picture. |
| B.
Right, The setting Drew used on his 5.0 megapixel camera means that these shots had to be drastically reduced to fit on this page. While I (webmaster at Mystical Universe and UFO investigator for 11years) am no expert on photography, emulsion or digital, there are a number of comments I think are relevant. I've stated these below. Anyone who can think of anything relevant to add is welcome to do so by clicking here on this link. Your comment will be added below |
![]() |
|
This is a straight blowup of the object in
Drew's second (B) shot. |
This is the object enhanced and sharpened using "Intellihance" a photoshop plugin |
This is the object color enhanced with "intellihance"
|
|
Webmaster's Comments: The object has definite color solidity, eliminating gaseous, transient or lens/camera induced effects. The object appears to be longer than it is wide with a flat bottom and some sort of hump or structure on top. Like a flat bottomed jet propelled aerial submarine. The object has not been artificially placed in the frame, as individual pixel comparison with adjacent area(s) shows. Given the time (7.30pm) the sun appears to be behind the photographers left shoulder. This means the angle is totally wrong for the sun to be reflected from the left end of the object back to the camera. The brightness seen on that part of the object is then most probably twin jet exhausts. The red roofed house appears to be between 350 to 500 metres away. The object I would guess seems to be somewhere between the ranges of 300 to 600 metres from the photographer which would give it an estimated size upwards of say 5 metres to a maximum of possibly 20 metres. (Estimating abilities based on Army experience). Bear in mind that any fast moving object will appear lengthened in a still frame photograph unless the shutter speed is super fast. Given their technology, UFOs should not require "jet exhausts" to drive them and nearly all UFO pics show no evidence of them. Of course, just to be contrary, some do show jet exhausts and this could well be one of that type. The only thing this Could be if its not a genuine "not of this Earth" UFO, is a new type of cruise missile. There have been suggestions that the military has been developing a wingless, finless cruise missile that has the shape similar to a surfboard. Of course Nevada is home to much of the military's technology development and test areas. Maybe we have a picture of one of these new cruise missiles or maybe we have a genuine UFO cruising Nevada in search of our military technology?
1.
|
||